Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:11:48 -0200 | From | Marcelo Tosatti <> | Subject | Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures |
| |
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 10:28:18PM +0100, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: > On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 06:33:48PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > So you can be hitting the e1000/TSO issue - care to retest with > > 2.6.10-rc1-mm3/4 please? > > > > Thanks a lot for testing! > > This is from 2.6.10-rc1-mm3: (i added show_free..) > > swapper: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20 > [<c0137f28>] __alloc_pages+0x242/0x40e > [<c0138119>] __get_free_pages+0x25/0x3f > [<c032ed55>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x69a/0x9b5 > [<c013b189>] kmem_getpages+0x21/0xc9 > [<c013be3a>] cache_grow+0xab/0x14d > [<c013c05e>] cache_alloc_refill+0x182/0x244 > [<c013c3ec>] __kmalloc+0x85/0x8c > [<c02fac89>] alloc_skb+0x47/0xe0 > [<c02997ca>] e1000_alloc_rx_buffers+0x44/0xe3 > [<c029944b>] e1000_clean_rx_irq+0x17c/0x4b7 > [<c0298fd0>] e1000_clean+0x51/0xe7 > [<c03010dc>] net_rx_action+0x7f/0x11f > [<c011daa3>] __do_softirq+0xb7/0xc6 > [<c011dadf>] do_softirq+0x2d/0x2f > [<c010614e>] do_IRQ+0x1e/0x24 > [<c0104756>] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 > [<c0101eae>] default_idle+0x0/0x2c > [<c0101ed7>] default_idle+0x29/0x2c > [<c0101f40>] cpu_idle+0x33/0x3c > [<c0448a1f>] start_kernel+0x14c/0x165 > [<c04484bd>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x1ab > DMA per-cpu: > cpu 0 hot: low 2, high 6, batch 1 > cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 2, batch 1 > cpu 1 hot: low 2, high 6, batch 1 > cpu 1 cold: low 0, high 2, batch 1 > Normal per-cpu: > cpu 0 hot: low 32, high 96, batch 16 > cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 32, batch 16 > cpu 1 hot: low 32, high 96, batch 16 > cpu 1 cold: low 0, high 32, batch 16 > HighMem per-cpu: > cpu 0 hot: low 14, high 42, batch 7 > cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 14, batch 7 > cpu 1 hot: low 14, high 42, batch 7 > cpu 1 cold: low 0, high 14, batch 7 > Free pages: 532kB (252kB HighMem) > Active:39820 inactive:208936 dirty:104508 writeback:672 unstable:0 free:133 slab:7779 mapped:15810 pagetables:410 > DMA free:8kB min:12kB low:24kB high:36kB active:384kB inactive:11400kB present:16384kB pages_scanned:192 all_unreclaimable? no > protections[]: 0 0 0 > DMA: 0*4kB 1*8kB 0*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 8kB > Normal: 0*4kB 0*8kB 1*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 1*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 272kB > HighMem: 15*4kB 8*8kB 2*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 252kB > Swap cache: add 1, delete 0, find 0/0, race 0+0 > printk: 696 messages suppressed. > swapper: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20
OK, do you have Nick watermark fixes in?
They increase the GFP_ATOMIC buffer (memory reserved for GFP_ATOMIC allocations) significantly, which is exactly the case here.
Its in Andrew's -mm tree already (the last -mm-bk contains it).
Its attached just in case - hope it ends this story.
---
linux-2.6-npiggin/mm/page_alloc.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/page_alloc.c~mm-restore-atomic-buffer mm/page_alloc.c --- linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-restore-atomic-buffer 2004-11-10 15:13:33.000000000 +1100 +++ linux-2.6-npiggin/mm/page_alloc.c 2004-11-10 14:57:54.000000000 +1100 @@ -1935,8 +1935,12 @@ static void setup_per_zone_pages_min(voi lowmem_pages; } - zone->pages_low = zone->pages_min * 2; - zone->pages_high = zone->pages_min * 3; + /* + * When interpreting these watermarks, just keep in mind that: + * zone->pages_min == (zone->pages_min * 4) / 4; + */ + zone->pages_low = (zone->pages_min * 5) / 4; + zone->pages_high = (zone->pages_min * 6) / 4; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags); } } @@ -1945,24 +1949,25 @@ static void setup_per_zone_pages_min(voi * Initialise min_free_kbytes. * * For small machines we want it small (128k min). For large machines - * we want it large (16MB max). But it is not linear, because network + * we want it large (64MB max). But it is not linear, because network * bandwidth does not increase linearly with machine size. We use * - * min_free_kbytes = sqrt(lowmem_kbytes) + * min_free_kbytes = 4 * sqrt(lowmem_kbytes), for better accuracy: + * min_free_kbytes = sqrt(lowmem_kbytes * 16) * * which yields * - * 16MB: 128k - * 32MB: 181k - * 64MB: 256k - * 128MB: 362k - * 256MB: 512k - * 512MB: 724k - * 1024MB: 1024k - * 2048MB: 1448k - * 4096MB: 2048k - * 8192MB: 2896k - * 16384MB: 4096k + * 16MB: 512k + * 32MB: 724k + * 64MB: 1024k + * 128MB: 1448k + * 256MB: 2048k + * 512MB: 2896k + * 1024MB: 4096k + * 2048MB: 5792k + * 4096MB: 8192k + * 8192MB: 11584k + * 16384MB: 16384k */ static int __init init_per_zone_pages_min(void) { @@ -1970,11 +1975,11 @@ static int __init init_per_zone_pages_mi lowmem_kbytes = nr_free_buffer_pages() * (PAGE_SIZE >> 10); - min_free_kbytes = int_sqrt(lowmem_kbytes); + min_free_kbytes = int_sqrt(lowmem_kbytes * 16); if (min_free_kbytes < 128) min_free_kbytes = 128; - if (min_free_kbytes > 16384) - min_free_kbytes = 16384; + if (min_free_kbytes > 65536) + min_free_kbytes = 65536; setup_per_zone_pages_min(); setup_per_zone_protection(); return 0; _
| |