Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 4 Jan 2004 16:50:28 +0000 | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: Pentium M config option for 2.6 |
| |
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 11:33:08AM -0500, Rob Love wrote:
> Yah. I was just answering in the abstract to the "does cache line > matter on non-SMP" question. > > I actually like this patch (perhaps since I have a P-M :) and think it > ought to go in, although I agree with others that the P-M is more of a > super-P3 than a scaled down P4.
FWIW, I agree with it too on the grounds that its non obvious the optimal setting is CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII. This seems cleaner IMO than changing the helptext to read...
"Pentium II" "Pentium III / Pentium 4M" "Pentium 4"
My other mail may have sounded like I objected to the patch per se, I don't.
Dave
-- Dave Jones http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |