Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: CPRM ?? Re: Possibly wrong BIO usage in ide_multwrite | From | Christophe Saout <> | Date | Fri, 02 Jan 2004 13:45:22 +0100 |
| |
Am Fr, den 02.01.2004 schrieb Andre Hedrick um 05:43:
> I am sorry but adding in a splitter to CPRM is not acceptable. > Digital Rights Management in the kernel is not acceptable to me, period. > > Maybe I have misread your intent and the contents on your website. > > Device-Mappers are one thing, intercepting buffers in the taskfile FSM > transport is another. This stinks of CPRM at this level, regardless of > your intent. Do correct me if I am wrong.
I can assure you I was never having DRM or anything like this in mind nor making fundamental changes to the IDE layer. It was just that ++bi_idx that bugged me. Must be a misunderstanding, sorry. :)
The only thing I'm having on my website is a device-mapper target that does basically the same as cryptoloop tries to. It's just about encrypting sensitive data on top of any other device, nothing else.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |