lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] arch-specific cond_syscall usage issues
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:31:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >
> > As has been previously noted, the cond_syscall is only ever cared about
> > on PPC when you try for !PCI. And this only happens realistically now,
> > on MPC8xx (it's usually present on IBM 4xx, and lets ignore APUS).
> > MPC8xx support has been broken for a while, but hopefully will get fixed
> > 'soon'.
> >
> > So can we please move this cond_syscall into kernel/sys.c ?
>
> Spose so. Are we sure it shouldn't be inside soem ppc-specfic ifdef?

At an extreme space concern it could be covered in a PPC32 || ALPHA
test. It should do no harm if it's not.

--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.076 / U:1.704 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site