Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] rq->curr==p not equivalent to task_running(rq,p) | From | Robert Love <> | Date | Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:49:22 -0500 |
| |
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 18:02, Joe Korty wrote:
> task_running(rq,p) is equivalent to (rq->curr == p) only for some > architectures. Boot tested on i386.
Oh, good catch.
Andrew, mind taking this?
Thanks, Joe.
Robert Love
diff -Nua 2.6/kernel/sched.c.0 2.6/kernel/sched.c --- 2.6/kernel/sched.c.0 2004-01-13 17:53:34.000000000 -0500 +++ 2.6/kernel/sched.c 2004-01-13 17:47:33.000000000 -0500 @@ -2062,7 +2062,7 @@ * our priority decreased, or if we are not currently running on * this runqueue and our priority is higher than the current's */ - if (rq->curr == p) { + if (task_running(rq, p)) { if (p->prio > oldprio) resched_task(rq->curr); } else if (p->prio < rq->curr->prio)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |