Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:55:06 -0800 | From | "Randy.Dunlap" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH(s)][RFC] variable size and signedness issues in ldt.c - potential problem? |
| |
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:51:40 +0100 (CET) Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk> wrote:
| | | On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Randy.Dunlap wrote: | | > On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:20:23 +0100 (CET) Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk> wrote: | > | > | | > | On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Andrew Morton wrote: | > | | > | > Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk> wrote: | > | > > | > | > > After creating the initial cleanup patch I've noticed several more | > | > > instances of this 'bad style'. If there's any interrest in cleaning them | > | > > up I'll be happy to create a patch. Is this wanted? | > | > | > | > I'd say that this and the whitespace adjustments are far too trivial to be | > | > raising patches at this time. | > | > | > | You are right, it /is/ trivial - I'll leave it alone for now. Maybe later | > | create a patch that does a more thorough cleanup and send it to the | > | trivial patch monkey. | > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | > Or I can put it into the KJ patchset and just never send it onward. | > That will at least get it some usage time. | > | > BTW, if you want to stick with trivial_Rusty, that's OK with me too. | > Rusty does a fine job and I'm not trying to compete with him. | > | | How about I create the patch (in a few days, I'm a little short on time), | then send it to Rusty's trivial and CC you ? | Then you can do with it what you please.
Sure, however you want to handle it.
-- ~Randy MOTD: Always include version info. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |