Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:39:15 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: suspend/resume support for PIT (time.c) |
| |
Hi!
> On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 12:03, Pavel Machek wrote: > > +static int pit_suspend(struct sys_device *dev, u32 state) > [snip] > > +static int pit_resume(struct sys_device *dev) > > +{ > > + write_seqlock_irq(&xtime_lock); > > + xtime.tv_sec = get_cmos_time() + clock_cmos_diff; > > + xtime.tv_nsec = 0; > > + write_sequnlock_irq(&xtime_lock); > > + return 0; > > +} > [snip] > > static struct sysdev_class pit_sysclass = { > > + .resume = pit_resume, > > + .suspend = pit_suspend, > > set_kset_name("pit"), > > }; > > As none of this really has anything to do w/ the PIT, and to avoid > confusion w/ the PIT timesource code, could we rename this to > "time_suspend" and "time_resume"?
Applied, altrough I'll not try to push it for a while. (I'm not sure if Andrew applied previous patches and do not want to clash).
Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |