lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you?
From
Date
On Mer, 2003-09-10 at 00:07, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> What about suspend-to-ram, APM, and runtime states?
>
> That actually makes it quite a bit more complicated, globally. By forcing
> the policy down to the drivers, you force each one to interpret the value
> themselves and make the decision. By doing it centrally, the only thing
> the low-level drivers have to worry about is going into the state.

APM and ACPI suspend/resume (especially resume) are different. Very
different with some hardware in fact. For IDE to be done perfectly you
want to know if its ACPI S4 or APM suspend. The driver needs to be able
to get the actual aim but most I agree wont care which.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.059 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site