lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [CFT][PATCH] new scheduler policy
From
Date
On Maw, 2003-09-02 at 15:25, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > in the best position to decide which process is more important.
> > That's why I proposed kernel based approach.
>
> Tasks can easily report their interactivity needs/nice value.
> X are already depend on clients not trying to screw each other,
> so thats okay.

There is a slight problem with a kernel based approach too - the app may
be remote.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.783 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site