Messages in this thread | | | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Minor scheduler fix to get rid of skipping in xmms | Date | Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:10:06 +1000 |
| |
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:56, Andrew Morton wrote: > Steven Pratt <slpratt@austin.ibm.com> wrote: > > For specjbb things are looking good from a throughput point of view. > > ... > > Volanomark, on the other hand is still off by quite a bit from test4 > > stock > > hmm, thanks. > > I'm not sure that volanomark is very representative of any real-world > thing. > > > ... > > If thre is any particular patch/tree combination you would like me to > > try out, please let me know and I will see if I can get the results for > > you. > > Could we please see test5 versus test5 plus Andrew's patch? > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test4/2 >.6.0-test4-mm6/broken-out/sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch > > and if you have time, also test5 plus sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch plus > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test4/2 >.6.0-test4-mm6/broken-out/sched-balance-fix-2.6.0-test3-mm3-A0.patch
Interestingly enough this drops the volano results the same proportion as Ingo's A3 patch. 11000 ->10400 throughput with same idle, but more schedule().
I've posted some results for test5 volano and test5-A0 here: http://kernel.kolivas.org/2.5/volano
More testing underway. Con
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |