lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [2.4.23-pre3] Possible bug in fs/buffer.c

On 09.08, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
>
> > On Llu, 2003-09-08 at 16:42, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> It's neither ugly, nor bogus. The only 100% reliable way to assign the
> >> maximum value to an unsigned integer is to use -1.
> >
> > Its not 100% reliable either 8).
>
> Could you please elaborate? Casting -1 to an unsigned type is guaranteed
> to yield the maximum value for that type, at least since C89, but I think
> even K&R C did get it right.
>

Would not be much cleaner to do use ~0UL ?

--
J.A. Magallon <jamagallon@able.es> \ Software is like sex:
werewolf.able.es \ It's better when it's free
Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (Cooker) for i586
Linux 2.4.23-pre2-jam1m (gcc 3.3.1 (Mandrake Linux 9.2 3.3.1-1mdk))
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.028 / U:0.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site