lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: swsusp: revert to 2.6.0-test3 state
Date
On Friday 05 September 2003 03:31, Pavel Machek wrote:
> It puts you in a better position, AFAICS. When code is rewritten
> anyway, "don't fix it if it aint broken" is not so important any
> more -- good for you.
>
> I still hope to avoid two software suspends in 2.6.X.
>
Bah, there may be three implementations now.

On Tuesday 02 September 2003 06:55, Patrick Mochel wrote:
>
> In all actuality, I don't need swsusp. I have a better suspend-to-disk
> implementation that is faster, smaller, and cleaner. I've hesitated
> merging it because I thought swsusp improvements would be more welcome.
> Obviously they're not; or you haven't actually taken the time to read the
> code.
>

This looks like a democratic (darwinistic) approach which will help to get
the best solution for 2.6.

Regards
Michael

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:1.702 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site