Messages in this thread | | | From | (bill davidsen) | Subject | Re: Quota Hash Abstraction 2.6.0-test2 | Date | 3 Sep 2003 17:23:00 GMT |
| |
In article <20030903161435.GC24897@DUK2.13thfloor.at>, Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at> wrote: | On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:56:58PM +0000, bill davidsen wrote: | > In article <20030731184341.GA21078@www.13thfloor.at>, | > Herbert =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=F6tzl?= <herbert@13thfloor.at> wrote: | > | > Is any of this, particularly the work mentioned in the last paragraph | > getting into the mail kernel? | | the quota fix was included in the next (test) release | so default quota will work again ...
Thanks for the quick response, that was my prime concern. I expect to need quota again in the near future. | | the Quota Hash Abstraction is neither a (big) performance | gain nor a feature bonus for the end user ... it is more | an enhancement to the code itself, allowing to have more | than one quota hash for arbitrary purposes ... | | I doubt, that this code will ever make it into mainline | without another 'good' reason to use it, but maybe the | --bind mount quota stuff would be such a reason, if the | interest for such things will eventually grow ... | | HTH, | Herbert
Big help, I have never had a performance problem with the quota stuff other than not performing at all ;-) Good to have the code handy though, use often follows capability rather than drives it. -- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |