Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Wed, 3 Sep 2003 10:21:04 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: UP Regression (was) Re: Scaling noise |
| |
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:51:56AM -0700, Cliff White wrote: > On the Scalable Test Platform, running osdl-aim-7, for the > UP case, 2.4 is a bit better than 2.6, this is consistent across > many runs. For SMP, 2.6 is better, but the delta is rather > small, until we get to 8 CPUS. We have a lot of un-parsed data from other > tests - might be some trends there also. > See http://developer.osdl.org/cliffw/reaim/index.html > 2.4 kernels are at the bottom of the page.
Do you have profile data for these runs? Also, that webpage doesn't have 2.4.x results.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |