lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] check headers for complete includes, etc.
Date
Am Montag, 29. September 2003 17:00 schrieb Jörn Engel:
>
> Would work. But I'd prefer to have that information inside the header
> files, under some syntax.
>
> /* attr: indirect header */
>
> Is this acceptable?

Just a suggestion: Make it a define. Comments tend to be re-formatted,
"improved", deleted, etc. You get the picture. So I think that:

#define PRAGMA_INDIRECT_HEADER TRUE

(or something similiar) would be better suited.

Regards,
Dominik
--
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities. (Francois Marie Arouet aka Voltaire, 1694-1778)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.088 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site