lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.0-test6
On Sun, 28 September 2003 21:31:50 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 09:16:22PM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > How about a check_headers target that roughly works like this:
> >
> > for (all header files in include/linux and include/asm) {
> > echo "#include <$HEADER>" > header.c
> > make header.o
> > rm header.c header.o
> > }
>
> That should do it. Can you also integrate the check Linus mentioned,
> to make sure no declarations are present.

If it's simple enough, you'll have it tomorrow. Linus' check might
take a bit longer, I'm not sure yet how to define an empty object
file. Is it enough if objdump -tT only shows sections?

> I would name the target: headercheck:
> to be consistent with the other targets.

ok.

> It should be fine having it as a separate target, then we can ask
> John Cherry to include it in his nightly builds.

That would be nice, yes.

Jörn

--
Measure. Don't tune for speed until you've measured, and even then
don't unless one part of the code overwhelms the rest.
-- Rob Pike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.091 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site