Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Wed, 24 Sep 2003 01:50:54 +0200 | From | Willy Tarreau <> | Subject | Re: log-buf-len dynamic |
| |
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:48:49AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:29:59AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > because you obviously never felt your heart accelerate and beat very loud > > during these operations and cannot understand why some people prefer to keep > > well, I kind of remeber that ;) > > So ok, that sounds a good enough argument to keep the old patch too, > despite you may be very few people using this.
Thanks for your understanding ;-)
> But let's do it only in 2.4, 2.6 should have it only dynamic. > > clearly if you can try to go 2.6 (possibly using a wrong .config) then > you can risk editing the lilo/grub file as well. And with 2.6, with the > printk rewrite that shrinks and grows the buffer, you should have no > need of the parameter any more.
I have not tried it remotely yet, but I may adapt to a new behaviour or write a patch :-)
Cheers, Willy
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |