Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:36:48 -0700 | From | "Randy.Dunlap" <> | Subject | Re: [CFT] [1/15] table-driven filesystems option parsing |
| |
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 15:21:05 -0400 Will Dyson <will_dyson@pobox.com> wrote:
| On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 14:56, Randy.Dunlap wrote: | | > Current (full) patch is at | > http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/patches/linux-260t4g-fsoptions.patch | > | > These patches apply to 2.6.0-test4 or -current (Sept. 5/2003). | > | > I have tested ext3, ext3, fat, isofs, jfs, & proc. | > | > I'd appreciate others testing all of these, please, especially | > the ones that I can't test (adfs, affs, hfs, hpfs, ufd, ufs, | > autofs[4]). | | As a filesystem maintainer, I like the idea of this patch! However, I | think it could use some comments on useage in the header file. There are | already too many filesystem interfaces where the only documentation on | how to use them is the way that existing filesystems use them. | | Below is a patch to convert befs to use parser.h. It kills some of my | least favorite code (yay!). | | The patch is tested a certain minimal amount (booted, mounted a | filesystem with options).
Thanks for the patch and comments. I'll try to add some usage docs to it also.
-- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |