Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 14 Sep 2003 09:19:22 +0100 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.0-test5 vs. modem cards |
| |
On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 12:51:36PM +0900, Norman Diamond wrote: > In file 8250_cs.c: > Line 61, identifies itself as "serial_cs.c" instead of "8250_cs.c". > Line 119 identifies itself as "serial_cs" instead of "8250_cs". > My partial understanding of Linux PCMCIA operations yields a guess that line > 119 is part of the cause for failure during execution, whereas line 61 only > potentially confuses future maintainers.
Its going to get renamed back to serial_cs shortly.
> Later in the same source file, calls to register_serial() and > unregister_serial() compile but fail during execution. Of course in order > to make it execute in the first place I have to manually modprobe 8250_cs, > because of the reason mentioned above. /var/log/messages gets reports that > those symbols are unknown.
I have no idea how you managed that. The configuration subsystem does not allow you to build 8250_cs.c as a module without building 8250.c in some manner, and 8250.c provides those symbols.
-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/ Linux kernel maintainer of: 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |