Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 13 Sep 2003 14:12:14 -0700 (PDT) | From | Andre Hedrick <> | Subject | RE: People, not GPL [was: Re: Driver Model] |
| |
David,
Agreed the total intent by the author is to impose a restriction. Thus the author by default lost his/her right to use, period. Ironic, how imposing a usage restriction will terminate ones own write to use.
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, David Schwartz wrote:
> > > > If people put GPL_ONLY symbol exports in their code, that's their call > > to make, is it not? It's their code and they're free to say "well, this > > is my code, and if you use this symbol, I consider your stuff to be a > > derived work". Once again it's up to the lawyers to decide whether > > this has legal value or not. > > If it has legal value, then it's an additional restriction. > > DS > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |