Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:21:54 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH][2.6] i386 /proc/irq/.../smp_affinity |
| |
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> This backs out the variable-length cpu bitmask handling. >> I appear to be printing out 16-bit chunks of all this in what appears >> to be the reverse of the order expected. Why not just reverse the order >> of the 16-bit chunks?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 10:07:58PM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > Indeed it does, i was thinking about supported systems and the lack of > NR_CPUS > BITS_PER_LONG ia32 boxen.
I'm sitting on one, I just don't have the power to configure it that way on any kind of regular basis. I'm going to bet the input version has this issue also.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |