Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Subject | Re: [SHED] Questions. | From | Robert Love <> | Date | Mon, 01 Sep 2003 01:55:45 -0400 |
| |
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 01:07, Con Kolivas wrote:
> I hate to keep butting in and saying this but this is not quite what happens. > If a task is considered interactive (a priority boost of 2 or more) and it > uses up a full timeslice then it is checked to see if a starvation limit has > been exceeded by the tasks on the expired array. If it hasn't exceeded the > limit, the interactive task will be rescheduled again ahead of everything > else. ie if A is the only task still considered interactive after using up > it's timeslice the first time it will go
I know this. I mentioned earlier what I was saying was ignoring the interactive task reinsertion optimization.
I am trying to explain things in general.
Robert Love
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |