Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 9 Aug 2003 20:44:57 +0100 | From | Jamie Lokier <> | Subject | Re: NULL. Again. (was Re: [PATCH] 2.4.22pre10: {,un}likely_p()) |
| |
Chip Salzenberg wrote: > According to Jamie Lokier: > > Not just K&R. These are different because of varargs: > > printf ("%p", NULL); > > printf ("%p", 0); > > *SIGH* I thought incorrect folk wisdom about NULL and zero and pointer > conversions had long since died out. More fool I. Please, *please*, > _no_one_else_ argue about NULL/zero/false etc. until after reading this: > > ===[[ http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/s5.html ]]===
Thanks Chip; I am much enlightened. That is a fine URL.
To onlookers: neither of those printf statements is portable :)
-- Jamie
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |