Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:24:43 +0400 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [2.6] reiserfs: fix locking in reiserfs_remount |
| |
Oleg Drokin wrote:
>Hello! > >On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:28:13AM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > >>> Since reiserfs_remount can be called without BKL held, we better take BKL in there. >>> Please apply the below patch. It is against 2.6.0-test2 >>> >>> >>is the BKL in reiserfs_write_unlock()? >> >> > >Yes. > > > >>Do we need to be adding more BKL usage, instead of the same or less at this >>point? >> >> > >Reiserfs needs BKL for it's journal operations. This is not "more", >for some time BKL was taken in the VFS, then whoever removed that, >forgot to propagate BKL down to actual fs methods that need the BKL. > >Bye, > Oleg >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > > Is it known who removed it?
-- Hans
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |