Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | Duncan Sands <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.0-test4: uhci-hcd.c: "host controller process error", slab call trace | Date | Sun, 31 Aug 2003 11:15:24 +0200 |
| |
> My feeling is that a reasonably large change may end up being the best > thing to do. In particular, we probably only need to have one QH per > queue, instead of one for each URB. But it'll be a while before that > stuff gets done.
But won't that result in starvation of some endpoints in favour of those with vast numbers of urbs queued on them? At the moment the per-urb QHs mean that the hc works on only one urb per endpoint before moving on to the next endpoint.
Ciao,
Duncan. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |