Messages in this thread | | | From | Benjamin Herrenschmidt <> | Date | Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:39:00 +0200 | Subject | Re: PCI PM & compatibility |
| |
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 01:29, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> I don't understand. We suspend the children before we suspend the device, > so as long as all the children go done, so will the parent device.
Forget it... It had crap in mind. Anyway, my point was actually the opposite than what I wrote :( I was really to make sure that if a device is "held" up by pm_users beeing non-NULL, it's _parents_ (and not it's children, sorry about the confusion), are also held non-suspended... I think I'll sleep a bit and then just go look at the code ;)
Ben.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |