Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Aug 2003 17:46:39 +0200 | From | Wiktor Wodecki <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH]O18int |
| |
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 01:03:19AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > There it is again; the reference to darn O10. Hrm. One question before > > > your holiday; your O10 kernel is it the same kernel tree or a > > > different/newere one? I'm looking to blame something else here I know but > > > I need to know; this just doesn't hold with any testing here. > > > > well, I run O10 on top of test2, since I didn't need any patches from > > test3 I didn't rediff it. > > So O18 is also on test2?
Okay, I applied O18 on top of test2 now. Xmms works as a charm, programm start is still slow while doing an tar xf linuxtest2.tar. Already open xterm's (one with mutt) react a bit in-interactive (I spawn vi to write this email and a :w takes 5 seconds). It is nonetheless worse than O10, sorry to say that.
-- Regards,
Wiktor Wodecki [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |