Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices | From | Daniel Gryniewicz <> | Date | 19 Aug 2003 15:27:48 -0400 |
| |
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 15:21, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 03:17:00PM -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 14:48, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > In my experience everybody who wants a different behaviour use some > > > more or less broken stateful L2/L3 switching hacks (like ipvs) or > > > having broken routing tables. While such hacks may be valid for some > > > uses they should not impact the default case. > > > > So, changing your default route is a "hack"? That's all that's > > necessary. You can even do it with "route del/route add". > > Necessary to do what exactly?
Cause Linux to issue an arp request with a tell address not on the interface sending the arp. -- Daniel Gryniewicz <dang@fprintf.net> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |