Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 Aug 2003 00:45:38 -0500 | From | Matt Mackall <> | Subject | Re: [CFT][PATCH] new scheduler policy |
| |
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 03:34:06PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > Matt Mackall wrote: > > > > >You forgot to mention fork() splitting its timeslice 2/3 to 1/3 parent > >to child. > > > > > > Hmm... did I do that? I don't actually have the code in front of me, but I > think the timeslice split is still 50/50 (see fork.c). Its the priority > points that go 2/3 to 1/3. Actually its a bit more complex than that even > and probably not exactly right...
Actually, it's as you say. The terms sleeptime and timeslice just confused me.
-- Matt Mackall : http://www.selenic.com : of or relating to the moon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |