Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Aug 2003 07:31:46 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: Dumb question: Why are exceptions such as SIGSEGV not logged |
| |
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 04:10:30AM +0800, Michael Frank wrote: > Linux logs almost everything, why not exceptions such as SIGSEGV in > userspace which may be very informative?
Such exceptions are part of the normal operation of certain kinds of programs, such as ones using (nowadays unusual) certain garbage collection algorithms. I actually installed such a beast (Lisp system) in no small part so it would exercise "invalid" memory accesses and test various bits of VM code related to such. For other VM people interested in it, there's an sbcl debian package that recompiles a moderately sized chunk of Lisp code and hence runs the system at install-time, and so exercises the SIGSEGV path rather heavily on 32-bit systems and/or systems with <= 2GB of RAM. No particular intervention apart from (re)installing it is required to pound the SIGSEGV path like a wild monkey, so it's actually a very convenient touch test for such things.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |