Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:22:27 +0200 (CEST) | From | Dennis Björklund <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] lirc for 2.5/2.6 kernels - 20030802 |
| |
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> This is no reason for keeping lircd as event dispatcher, the input layer > would do equally well (with liblirc_client picking up events from > /dev/input/event<x> instead of lircd).
Would this allow you to have one reciever and different remote controles (used for different programs in the end)?
You don't want both remotes map button 1 to the same BTN_1 or whatever symbol is used.
-- /Dennis
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |