Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:39:43 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.0-test3-mm1 |
| |
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 01:17:04PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: >> kpmd_ctor() is unusual; how many runs does this profile represent? >> Does it represent the first run? Ideally, all your kernel pmd's should >> be cached. If it's not the first run, then logged slab cache statistics >> would be interesting to determine whether this is still the case even >> while effective cacheing is going on or whether slab cache reaping is >> blowing these things away (i.e. either ineffective cacheing is happening >> or for some reason cacheing them isn't good enough).
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 03:50:29PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > It's the average of 5 runs, after an initial warmup run which is discarded.
Okay, logging /proc/slabinfo and /proc/meminfo at various points throughout the run would be helpful here.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |