Messages in this thread | | | From | Marc-Christian Petersen <> | Subject | Re: Status of the IO scheduler fixes for 2.4 | Date | Sun, 6 Jul 2003 09:58:36 +0200 |
| |
On Friday 04 July 2003 23:37, Chris Mason wrote:
Hi Chris,
> > If the IO fairness still doesnt > > get somewhat better for general use (well get isolated user reports and > > benchmarks for both the two patches), then I might consider the q->full > > patch (it has throughtput drawbacks and I prefer avoiding a tunable > > there). now there is io-stalls-10 in .22-pre3 (lowlat elev. + fixpausing). Could you please send "q->full patch" as ontop of -pre3? :-)
Thank you.
ciao, Marc
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |