Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 5 Jul 2003 12:44:28 +0200 | From | Jörn Engel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2.5.73] Signal stack fixes #1 introduce PF_SS_ACTIVE |
| |
On Sat, 5 July 2003 09:30:31 +0200, Jörn Engel wrote: > On Fri, 4 July 2003 17:39:01 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > So how about something like the appended? Very simple patch,i and in fact > > it's more logical than the old behaviour (the old behaviour punched > > through blocked signals, the new ones says "if you block or ignore the > > signal we will just kill you through the default action"). > > That seems to be the best solution. Thanks!
Except that the patch didn't match the description. My test loops just as happily as before and the conditional part of give_sigsegv is pointless now. That might really break some threading stuff.
Anyway, the idea still makes sense, so I will try to come up with a working patch.
Jörn
-- "Translations are and will always be problematic. They inflict violence upon two languages." (translation from German) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |