Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:43:14 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] O11int for interactivity |
| |
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:43:22AM +0200, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: > What makes me even more wondering is that 2.6.0-test1-wli tree does not suck > at all for interactivity where no scheduler changes were made.
Could you make sure that you're not using 1A? (vanilla 1 and 1B are both fine for these purposes).
Also, can I get a before/after of the following during an mp3 skip test?
vmstat 1 | tee -a vmstat.log
n=1; while true; do /usr/sbin/readprofile -n -m /boot/System.map-`uname -r` | sort -k 2,2 > profile.log.$n; n=$(( $n + 1 )); sleep 1; done
If you could stop the logging shortly after the skip in the kernel that does skip (but not _too_ shortly after, give it at least 1 second) I would be much obliged. The "before" picture is most important. An "after" picture might also be helpful, but isn't strictly necessary.
Thanks.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |