Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 31 Jul 2003 18:06:43 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: OHCI problems with suspend/resume |
| |
Hi!
> >>The "initiators" all talk to _both_ infrastructures, but they > >>don't talk to the driver model stuff in the same way. For > >>example, on suspend:
> >Where does acpi call pm_*()? It seems like it does not and it seems > >like a bug to me. > > Doesn't; it showed up in a 'grep' that I should have examined > more closely. Sorry! But both swsusp and APM have the "using > both registration schemes" issue (consistency matters here). > > Why does it seem like a bug -- because it's using only the "new" > infrastructure, while there are still a few drivers that only > register to the old one?
Yes.
> I'd rather see those drivers (about > a dozen) have compile time #ifdef CONFIG_PM #warnings, and call > them the bug...
I guess I like that, too.. But at this point whole PCI relies on old-style pm_*(); that needs to be fixed, first. Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |