Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:09:08 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: OHCI problems with suspend/resume |
| |
Hi!
> >>All of which is a roundabout way of adding to what I > >>said: the PM infrastructure USB will need to rely on > >>seems like it needs polishing yet! :) > > > > > >Do you need vetoing? Otherwise it should be ready, except for APM. > > USB drivers don't talk suspend/resume yet, so they > won't notice missing features there. Regressions > are a different story though. > > But I can imagine that usb-storage (or is that SCSI?) > might want to veto suspending devices that are being > used for some kinds of i/o. Eventually it should exist.
For what kind of I/O? I do not see a reason for disk to veto suspend. CD-burner might want to do that, but it still would be bad idea... (Running on battery, battery goes low, and you destroy your CD *and* your filesystem. Pavel -- Horseback riding is like software... ...vgf orggre jura vgf serr. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |