Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:33:11 -0700 | From | Tom Rini <> | Subject | Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase |
| |
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:07:24AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org> writes: > > And wouldn't it be nice to have one 'policy enforcing tool' or whatever > > that you feed it policy_desktop.txt, policy_embedded_in_my_fridge.txt or > > policy_enterprise.txt ? > > Sure, but not nice enough to justify requiring more memory or whatever > (of course just that one feature's not going to make much difference, > but in aggregate, they might).
Well, that sort-of depends on which 'embedded' board you're talking about really. And the trade-off between the work needed for a hacked-up 1 off, the space that could be saved by doing this, and the space that could be saved elsewhere. Perhaps on the embedded_in_my_fridge machine it might make sense, but not ever embedded device is quite so tiny and strapped for space.
-- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |