Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:54:38 +0200 | From | Tomas Szepe <> | Subject | Re: raid5 autoselecting a slower checksum function |
| |
> [bharada@coral.ocn.ne.jp] > > On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:17:00 +0300 (EEST) > Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee> wrote: > > <snip> > > > Why doesn't it select p5_mmx if it is 37% faster than pIII_sse? > > This has come up before - see : > > http://hypermail.idiosynkrasia.net/linux-kernel/archived/2003/week01/1894.html
Fair enough, but wouldn't it be more appropriate if the kernel printed a message like "SSE present, good. No need to try the other checksumming methods" in this case?
-- Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |