lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)
From
Date
Am Son, 2003-07-27 um 15.28 schrieb Hans Reiser:

> it is suitable for any flash device that has wear leveling built into
> the hardware (e.g. all compact flash cards)

Are you sure CF cards have wear leveling? I'm pretty confident that they
have defect sector management but no wear leveling. There's a huge
difference between those two.

> or for which a wear leveling block device driver is used (I don't know
> if one exists for Linux).

This is normally done by the filesystem (e.g. JFFS2).

--
Servus,
Daniel
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.124 / U:1.708 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site