lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] TCP and UDP implementations
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 03:15:53AM -0400, Jeff Sipek wrote:
> Hello all,
> I noticed that there are two implementations of TCP and UDP in the kernel -
> one for IPv4 and the other for IPv6. Correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn't
> it be better to just have one implementation for both versions of IP? I know
> this for sure:

The way how things are in 2.4 (I haven't looked too deeply into 2.5/2.6),
IPv6 TCP and UDP do NEED IPv4 TCP code to make most of TCP logic.
With UDP the amount of logic in kernel side is a lot simpler, and
I do think the code was in essense duplicated.

> 1) it would decrease the size of the kernel (this wouldn't be too dramatic,
> but still)
>
> 2) it would make maintaining of the code half the work

Because of the degree of present sharing: no.

> AFAIK there are small differences in TCP and UDP between IPv4 and IPv6,
> but they could be resolved using simple "work arounds."

IPv6's TCP is (was) just that kind of "work around" to handle differences
in IP addresses.

> Thanks,
> Jeff.

/Matti Aarnio
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.054 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site