Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:43:16 -0700 (PDT) | From | Andre Hedrick <> | Subject | Re: OT: Vanilla not for embedded?! Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase - get_current()? |
| |
Where is the "deep" fork storaged, sounds interesting! At lets it should buisness friendly.
-a
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 05:37:39PM +0200, Ihar Philips Filipau wrote: > > P.S. Offtopic. As I see it Linux & Linus have made the decision of > > optimization. Linux after all is capitalismus creation: who has more > > money do control everything. Server market has more money - they do more > > work on kernel and they systems are not that far from developers' > > workstations - so Linux gets more and more server/workstation oriented. > > This will fit desktop market too - if your computer was made to run > > WinXP AKA exp(bloat) - it will be capable to run any OS. Linus repeating > > 'small is beatiful' sounds more and more like crude joke... > > As for embedded market - it is already in deep fork and far far away > > from vanilla kernels... Vanilla really not that relevant to real world... > > Vanilla will be what people put into it. And I have seen more messages from > embedded people complaining, than actually doing and submitting patches for > merging. > > So the embedded trees are a deep fork huh? Did you or anyone else do > anything to merge during 2.5?! > > And now you see why there is a "deep" fork... > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |