Messages in this thread | | | From | Linux Kernel Mailing List <> | Date | Sat, 19 Jul 2003 08:16:10 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD |
| |
>> >> If everyone spent the time replacing bitkeeper instead of beating >> up Larry they'd get a lot further. >> > Linux isn't the only free operating system in existance, and >> although BK seems to suit the requirements of a lot of Linux >> developers, that doesn't mean that it meets the requirements of >> other free OS >> > development teams. >> > I strongly suspect that we'll see a free SCM developed after a few >> more years of HURD development, for example. >> > Doesn't mean we'll switch to it, though, we haven't switched to my >> bug database, have we? :-). >> > John. >> >> Given that large chunks of HURD come from Linux, please refer to it as >> Linux/HURD. > > What HURD code comes from Linux? GNU/Mach uses code from Linux, but not > HURD as far as I know. >
Hi John! Go take a look at their networking, and IDE code.
----------------------------------------- This email was sent using SquirrelMail. "Webmail for nuts!" http://squirrelmail.org/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |