Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Jul 2003 17:04:00 +0200 | From | Andries Brouwer <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] PATCH: typo bits |
| |
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 07:33:19AM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> | Isosynchronous is (was?) not an English word. > | > | Oh, but we aren't speaking English - this is about USB devices. > | Read the USB standard and see that it has an isosynchronous mode. > > It does? I can't find it in the main USB 2.0 spec. > It discusses isochronous, which is what I would prefer to see, > regardless of the USB spec.
Ah, yes, you are right. I did a grep on the USB docs directory and it is full of isosynchronous, but those are all fragments from the net. The actual standards correctly use isochronous. Sorry.
Andries
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |