Messages in this thread | | | From | Michael Buesch <> | Subject | Re: devfsd | Date | Thu, 17 Jul 2003 18:38:59 +0200 |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 17 July 2003 17:56, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:46:10PM -0500, Ro0tSiEgE LKML wrote: > > Why is devfsd still tagged as EXPERIMENTAL even in 2.6.0-test1 ? Is > > there something wrong with it, or has it just not been changed? > > It's still there because we don't have a BROKEN tag.
Hm, should we introduce a BROKEN tag? (I'm not kidding. :) ) Because in a development tree, many things are known broken and with this tag we may reduce the same bug-reports on this list over and over again.
- -- Regards Michael Buesch http://www.8ung.at/tuxsoft Penguin on this machine: Linux 2.4.21 - i386
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/FtEuoxoigfggmSgRAvvxAJ4oeM9wSBYh9zSMESK90bFR+JfLXgCfWiDU BZdHfen1MsXcNv6OicXSr9w= =wrz0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |