Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:38:31 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.0-test1-mm1 |
| |
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 07:41:55AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > >> Oh, well that won't fly; it effectively isn't a constant initializer. > >> I'll see what can be rammed past gcc. We're shooting for something > >> with array element 0 equal to 0x1UL and all others 0. > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 08:02:07AM -0700, Barry K. Nathan wrote: > > BTW, following my e-mail signature in this message is my .config. I > > guess the most notable setting is that CONFIG_SMP is disabled (i.e., > > it's a UP compile). > > Hmm. Well, ditching the strong typechecking would "fix" it, though > that's really only papering over it. >
It doesn't _have_ to be initialised at compile time. Just stick a little loop in init_IRQ()?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |