lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: utimes/futimes/lutimes syscalls
Andrew Morton writes:
> Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > If
> > there are filesystems which store the sub-seconds on disk I think this
> > is necessary since otherwise all kinds of programs (including archives)
> > cannot be written correctly. If the sub-seconds only live in memory I
> > still think it would be good to have the syscalls but it would not be
> > that urgent.
>
> XFS (at least) stores nanoseconds on disk. So yes, I think we should make
> this change.

so does reiser4.

> -

Nikita.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.928 / U:0.896 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site