Messages in this thread | | | From | Nikita Danilov <> | Date | Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:45:30 +0400 | Subject | Re: utimes/futimes/lutimes syscalls |
| |
Andrew Morton writes: > Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > If > > there are filesystems which store the sub-seconds on disk I think this > > is necessary since otherwise all kinds of programs (including archives) > > cannot be written correctly. If the sub-seconds only live in memory I > > still think it would be good to have the syscalls but it would not be > > that urgent. > > XFS (at least) stores nanoseconds on disk. So yes, I think we should make > this change.
so does reiser4.
> -
Nikita.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |