Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 11 Jul 2003 12:39:50 +0300 | From | Mika Penttilä <> | Subject | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked |
| |
Who adds the subnet router anycast address, kernel itself? Since what? I don't see this in 2.5.
--Mika
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ???? wrote:
>In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307111143470.26262-100000@netcore.fi> (at Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:46:00 +0300 (EEST)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> says: > > > >>>I don't like this >>>while I would be ok to have configuration option >>>not to support anycast. >>> >>> >>With "not to support anycast" you probably meant "not to support >>subnet-router anycast address [automatically, in the kernel, as now]" ? >>These are entirely different things. >> >> > >I meant disabling anycast entirely. > > > >>(Note that if there's a user-level API for setting anycast addresses, one >>could kick the subnet-router anycast address out of the kernel too. >>Whether that's desirable is another thing.) >> >> > >We have but we cannot; it is refcnt'ed. > >--yoshfuji >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |