lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: CONFIG_QFMT_V2 vs. `VFS v0 quota format support'
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:50:33PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >
> > Why does the help text for CONFIG_QFMT_V2 say `VFS v0 quota format support' and
> > not `VFS v2 quota format support'?
>
> Ask Jan, that's the name he's been using all through the development of
> the patch and in the quota tools.
At the beginning I started calling the original quota format 'old' and
the new one 'v0' (because in the quota file there's written 0 in the
version field ;)). If I did the decision now I would name it
differently...
In the code on the other hand I started naming the formats v1 and v2
because internal type identifiers are '1' and '2'.
So I agree that this is a bit messy but I'm not sure it's worth
renaming.

Honza

--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SuSE CR Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.023 / U:0.760 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site