Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Thu, 10 Jul 2003 20:51:12 +0200 | From | Jan Kara <> | Subject | Re: CONFIG_QFMT_V2 vs. `VFS v0 quota format support' |
| |
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:50:33PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > Why does the help text for CONFIG_QFMT_V2 say `VFS v0 quota format support' and > > not `VFS v2 quota format support'? > > Ask Jan, that's the name he's been using all through the development of > the patch and in the quota tools. At the beginning I started calling the original quota format 'old' and the new one 'v0' (because in the quota file there's written 0 in the version field ;)). If I did the decision now I would name it differently... In the code on the other hand I started naming the formats v1 and v2 because internal type identifiers are '1' and '2'. So I agree that this is a bit messy but I'm not sure it's worth renaming.
Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> SuSE CR Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |