lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: PTY DOS vulnerability?
How about giving each user his own set of virtual ptys?

Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2003-06-30 at 22:31, Fredrik Tolf wrote:
>
>>That is true, though, of course. Stupid me not to think about
>>that. However, that means that an administrator who could find
>>himself being under such an attack might not think about it
>>either. Also, from the outside, the ssh client just does
>>nothing, making it look as if the server is unresponsive. Of
>>course, the exact error is logged to the server's syslog, but if
>>you can't view it, then you won't know about it.
>>
>>So all in all, do you think I should implement a per-user
>>resource limit on PTYs?
>
>
> There are a whole collection of things that would benefit from that kind
> of management - go for it but make it possible to add other stuff too
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.038 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site